[DGD] Re: Couple DGD questions

[Stephen Schmidt]

On Fri, 12 Jun 1998, Felix A. Croes wrote:
> To be yet more precise: <any> calls made to static
> functions in the auto object can never be redirected to a new function
> by masking the static function, no matter from where the calls are
> made.  In C++ terminology, static functions in the auto object are
> not "virtual".
 
To put this in language "for the rest of us" :)  this means that
in the auto object, "static nomask" is redundant?

Although I would say just to avoid confusion, it's probably best
to use "static nomask" anyway just so that there's a visual
reminder of what the behavior is.

Steve





List config page:  http://list.imaginary.com/mailman/listinfo/dgd