[DGD] Re: Why C instead of C++
Gregory D Lewis
glewis at maths.adelaide.edu.au
Mon Oct 26 17:26:28 CET 1998
> Hi,
>
> I was coding some stuff (a stringlib) in C++ (I'm fairly new to C++) and i
> wondered why the dgd driver doesn't use C++ for its strings and objects.
> Especially the operator overloading seems really useful to me.
>
> I'm sure that you have your reasons for this but i don't know them. Could
> you please tell me what the disadvantages of C++ are in this case?
>
> Regards,
>
> Marc Spoorendonk
Dworkin has summed this up pretty well :).
In addition, you might be interested in looking at
http://www.mozilla.org/docs/tplist/catBuild/portable-cpp.html
which is the set of restrictions the Mozilla project place on people submitting
C++ code to try and ensure portability. Many of the benefits of C++ go out the
window!
With the release of the recent ANSI C++ standard however one would hope that
writing portable C++ programs may become a lot more practical in a year or
so (depending on how long compiler writers take to implement the standard).
--
Greg Lewis Applied Maths Department
Email : glewis at maths.adelaide.edu.au University of Adelaide
--
"It's not Camelot, but it's not Cleveland, either."
-- Kevin White, mayor of Boston
List config page: http://list.imaginary.com/mailman/listinfo/dgd
More information about the DGD
mailing list