[DGD]DGD extension interface, some thoughts

[Felix A. Croes]

Michael Bergbauer <michael.bergbauer at gmx.net> wrote:

>[...]
> what happens if I install two packets, that each defines one new kfun? Then I
> have two config-functions. That is what John wanted to point out, if I got it
> correct (if not, then I'll point it out ;))
>
> We really should find a better method then just redefining one method, because
> you otherwise, you always have to tweak around in the sources when adding an
> additional module, and noone will benefit of it. It should make installing new
> packets easier (than the current patch method!), and not more compilcated.

All right, but I am going to stay out of that discussion :)  From DGD's
point of view, it is just one function.

Regards,
Dworkin

List config page:  http://list.imaginary.com/mailman/listinfo/dgd