[DGD] sscanf

David Jackson araborn at home.com
Fri Dec 7 08:08:47 CET 2001


I stand corrected then.  Thank you for pointing that out for me.

But, you're right.  6 of one. Half a dozen of the other.

David


At 10:45 PM 12/6/2001 -0800, you wrote:
>  > I think it's cheaper on cycles to do a single do-while loop, including 
> your
>  > functionality in the loop, than it is to do a function call and THEN a
>  > for-next loop.    I guess it's all in how you look at it.
>
>Well, since DGD is interpreted, simple operations cost relatively
>more than they would in C compared to complex ones that execute in
>the driver. So if you can offload a load of the work to a kfun like
>explode, it's often worth the while. But obviously a do-while loop
>will do just fine... just a matter of taste...
>
>
>Zell
>_________________________________________________________________
>List config page:  http://list.imaginary.com/mailman/listinfo/dgd

_________________________________________________________________
List config page:  http://list.imaginary.com/mailman/listinfo/dgd



More information about the DGD mailing list