[DGD] sscanf
David Jackson
araborn at home.com
Fri Dec 7 08:08:47 CET 2001
I stand corrected then. Thank you for pointing that out for me.
But, you're right. 6 of one. Half a dozen of the other.
David
At 10:45 PM 12/6/2001 -0800, you wrote:
> > I think it's cheaper on cycles to do a single do-while loop, including
> your
> > functionality in the loop, than it is to do a function call and THEN a
> > for-next loop. I guess it's all in how you look at it.
>
>Well, since DGD is interpreted, simple operations cost relatively
>more than they would in C compared to complex ones that execute in
>the driver. So if you can offload a load of the work to a kfun like
>explode, it's often worth the while. But obviously a do-while loop
>will do just fine... just a matter of taste...
>
>
>Zell
>_________________________________________________________________
>List config page: http://list.imaginary.com/mailman/listinfo/dgd
_________________________________________________________________
List config page: http://list.imaginary.com/mailman/listinfo/dgd
More information about the DGD
mailing list