[DGD]compile_object() kfun

[Stephen Schmidt]

On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Felix A. Croes wrote:
> My alternative hypothesis is that since recompiling an existing
> object does not call create() in the object, the object is not
> re-initialized and keeps using the old data.

I believe that'd explain all the results. I'll pass that
back to the people who made the original bug report.

Design question: Should the update command call create()
in the object in such a case? I think perhaps it should.
Anyone have an opinion one way or the other?

Thanks!

Steve 




List config page:  http://list.imaginary.com/mailman/listinfo/dgd