[DGD] Problem with call_other()
Noah Gibbs
angelbob at monkeyspeak.com
Tue Feb 18 10:30:50 CET 2003
On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, David Jackson wrote:
> I'm more of the opinion that, if it's sitting in my editor, and I can edit it,
> save it, and compile it, then whatever I do with it is ok, until I
> re-distribute it. And redistribution is only sacred if there's a piece of
> tech there that I can't create from scratch.
Generally correct. "Fair use" gives you some rights in this direction,
I believe. But "redistribution is only sacred if there's a piece...I
can't create from scratch" isn't actually true. It's not a valid legal
defense, I mean. Put it this way -- if you could somehow get the source
for MS-Windows, redistributing only the chunks that Linux already does
still isn't kosher. It's copyrighted, so the fact that there's already a
public equivalent (or you can already do the equivalent) doesn't mean it's
not copyrighted. For the same reason, a really good author can't
redistributed the work of a really bad author free of charge :-)
> But, I understand the sentiment, and agree, which is why I also believe in
> freely distributed patches, diff files, open source, etc.
Yup. Everything I've written for DGD, text or code, is public
domain. That goes for my web site and for Phantasmal.
--
angelbob at monkeyspeak.com
See my page of DGD documentation at
"http://phantasmal.sourceforge.net/DGD/"
If you post to the DGD list, you may see yourself there!
_________________________________________________________________
List config page: http://list.imaginary.com/mailman/listinfo/dgd
More information about the DGD
mailing list