[DGD] Re: My idea for the DGD driver - validate
Josh Dady
jpd at indecisive.com
Fri Feb 13 16:26:02 CET 2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Feb 12, 2004, at 7:07 PM, Felix A. Croes wrote:
> Regarding calling security, I think one mistake was made during the
> inception of LPC: functions (and variables) should be private by
> default. Unfortunately it is now too late to change this.
I don't know about that -- the idea isn't that much different from the
semantic changes that happen when you change the typechecking config
setting. If you reallyl wanted to, you could even introduce a mode
where declarators sprinkle member-access magic dust on the object,
similar to how strict types happen at typechecking==0.
Zot!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3
iQA/AwUBQCzsnDbRoEWRn4lnEQJoUQCfWyvuUDI8b1jBKVPybMD3XRRJrAAAnjNe
ltEQBfj3cfnlQ2DILK7w530r
=J60e
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_________________________________________________________________
List config page: http://list.imaginary.com/mailman/listinfo/dgd
More information about the DGD
mailing list