[DGD] Recursion in recompile(), is this correct?
Noah Gibbs
noah_gibbs at yahoo.com
Sat Jan 10 23:05:14 CET 2004
--- Robert Forshaw <iouswuoibev at hotmail.com> wrote:
> Why does the docs suggest that I should be
> destructing the object then after compiling it? (To
> re-quote: "If B should
> actually be recompiled (inheriting the
> new version of C from B), the driver object
> must destruct B").
Actually, it says only that it must be destructed.
You're recompiling then destructing. You should
either change the order of these, or just do the
destruction, depending on how automatic update works
in your other functions.
=====
------
noah_gibbs at yahoo.com
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes
http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus
_________________________________________________________________
List config page: http://list.imaginary.com/mailman/listinfo/dgd
More information about the DGD
mailing list