[DGD] Recursion in recompile(), is this correct?

[Noah Gibbs]

--- Bart van Leeuwen <bart at wotf.org> wrote:
> [...] I would not want all code
> to update itself
> automatically like that, for one because I am not
> aware always of what
> users of a library are doing at that moment, and
> they may have changes
> pending themselves that do not compile yet or need
> to be compiled at a
> specific moment.

  Yup.  Phantasmal gives you the choice of single
compilation or piecemeal.  It doesn't let you build
"everything that depends on <foo>", but it probably
will eventually (when full rebuilds are too slow :-)


=====
------
noah_gibbs at yahoo.com

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes
http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus
_________________________________________________________________
List config page:  http://list.imaginary.com/mailman/listinfo/dgd