[DGD] Re: call_other()

[Par Winzell]

Par Winzell wrote:
>   o = new_object(ARRAY_LIST);
>   o->add("foo");

I forgot to mention, I take it for granted that we already have some
code in place that forces any subclass of ARRAY_LIST to implement any
function prototypes declared in ARRAY_LIST. This makes object types
usable, and Dworkin's recent DGD changes makes it possible.

For the above code, assuming

  object ARRAY_LIST o;


I think we should simply ban 'object' without a supplied object type.
The only reason to keep it is to get a pointer reference to the driver
object. What's the point?



Zell