[DGD] Commercial question

[Noah Gibbs]

  Eh.  To some people that's what matters, to some it isn't.  In terms of "what
can I get away with", what Felix has said on the list is irrelevant.  There are
many of us who really care what Felix feels on the topic, but we're mostly
people who already have pretty clear legal standing vis-a-vis commercial DGD,
such as purely noncommercial MUD authors, and such as Skotos.

--- Andrew McClintock <acmmcc at gmail.com> wrote:

> Isn't what matters here that Felix said it wasn't allowed? Whether or
> not the license stipulates what it does, he has been fairly explicit
> on the matter.
> 
> On 3/31/06, Shentino <shentino at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I'm still thinking that if the donations are OPTIONAL and you don't
> > get any guarantees in return, it qualifies as a gift.  I'll have to
> > study my law book some more to be sure though...
> >
> > Contractual stipulations expressly forbidding donations without a
> > license could always be made part of an End User License Agreement
> > entirely separate from a copyright.
> >
> > __________________________________________
> > http://mail.dworkin.nl/mailman/listinfo/dgd
> >
> 
> __________________________________________
> http://mail.dworkin.nl/mailman/listinfo/dgd
> 




__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com