[DGD] More on asynchronous thread starts
Shentino
shentino at gmail.com
Mon Dec 31 18:31:41 CET 2007
I was under the impression that any "hooks" for dealing with MP
specific issues (such as cancellation, rescheduling, committment, and
whatnot), could simply be stubbed out in SP as no-ops.
By custom event I don't mean event in the DGD style...rather,
"something happening that DGD doesn't yet know about". Which would,
like native I/O, originate from OUTSIDE the driver. DGD/MP has to
have SOME way to inject ER's from callouts and user I/O. Ergo, my
impression that it could also in some way be extended to deal with
occurences of my own choosing.
Finding out there's actual DGD/MP lingo called "events" further confuses me. B-/
On Dec 29, 2007 5:30 AM, Felix A. Croes <felix at dworkin.nl> wrote:
> Shentino <shentino at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > The idea I was talking about probably means you wouldn't have to.
> >
> > If you provide an MP interface for exec-round injection, it can look
> > the same in both DGD and DGD/MP.
> >
> > Say I want something done LPC-side in response to some custom event.
>
> And how are you going to have custom events without threading?
>
>
> Regards,
> Dworkin
> ___________________________________________
> https://mail.dworkin.nl/mailman/listinfo/dgd
>
More information about the DGD
mailing list