[DGD] Buffered I/O in atomic mode

[Noah Gibbs]

  Hard to say.  The only thing I'd normally use it for is error logging, and
you're better off just buffering the error logs for that.

  Somebody else may have some real use for it, though.

--- Shentino <shentino at gmail.com> wrote:

> Just htought of a neat way to get around the "no fs changes in
> atomic"...just buffer the writes.
> 
> However, things could get real messy if I attempt to rename files.
> 
> So far, I'm thnking of taking inspiration from the Linux kernel's
> dcache and icache.
> 
> Is supporting filesystem reorganizations in atomic mode worht hte trouble?
> ___________________________________________
> https://mail.dworkin.nl/mailman/listinfo/dgd
> 





       
____________________________________________________________________________________
Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for today's economy) at Yahoo! Games.
http://get.games.yahoo.com/proddesc?gamekey=monopolyherenow