[DGD] 1.3.2

[Shentino]

which would be by definition.

My question involved concurrent cases of both public and private
inheritance, direct or otherwise..

On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 4:32 AM, <bart at wotf.org> wrote:

> I'd expect it to return -1 when there is only private inheritance, and a
> simple test suggests thats exactly what it does.
>
> On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 12:40:56 +0200, Felix A. Croes wrote
> > Shentino <shentino at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Well since you mentioned it I'll say thank you. I'll be testing it
> shortly
> > > so don't count your unhatched chicks yet :P.
> > >
> > > Though honestly I didn't feel a big fuss needed to be made about it.
> >
> > You're welcome.  But yes, whether or not it worked for you was the
> > sort of response I was hoping for.
> >
> > > At any rate my question about how instance_of reacts to concurrent
> private
> > > and public inheritance was a serious one.
> >
> > Well, don't despair.  With 150-odd people on the mailing list,
> > chances are that eventually someone will spend the 10 seconds it
> > takes to find the answer; provided, of course, that you make
> > <very> clear that you yourself haven't yet done so.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Felix Croes
>
>
> --
> Created with Open WebMail at http://www.bartsplace.net/
> Read my weblog at http://soapbox.bartsplace.net/
>
> ___________________________________________
> https://mail.dworkin.nl/mailman/listinfo/dgd
>