[DGD] A few questions: was Re: The kernel library

[Kurt Nordstrom]

For what it's worth, I'm finding Gurbalib easier to get started with, for
mainly two reasons:

1) A lot of the basic stuff you need to get a Mud "off the ground" is
already there.

2) It borrows a lot of conventions from the "standard" LPC muds, which I'm
used to.

Just my $0.25.

On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Felix A. Croes <felix at dworkin.nl> wrote:

> Tyler Littlefield <tyler at tysdomain.com> wrote:
>
> > > Gurbalib is what I would recommend, but since you have ruled that out,
> > > I don't know what to tell you.  Perhaps the authors of other mudlibs
> > > can fill you in on the benefits of each.
> > >
> > >
> > I haven't exactly ruled it out persey, I just find the persistents
> > upgrading hard to work with, as I am learning LPC, and am not really
> > sure how to fix that.
>
> I'm not an expert on gurbalib, but I think it works fine without
> persistence.  In the worst case, you could restart the mud each
> time you make a change that you don't want to use persistent
> upgrading for.
>
> Regards,
> Felix Croes
> ___________________________________________
> https://mail.dworkin.nl/mailman/listinfo/dgd
>



-- 
http://www.blar.net/kurt/blog/