[DGD] Windows telnet clients

[Noah Gibbs]

Phantasmal's handling was, in turn, mostly borrowed shamelessly from DGD itself.  One possibility would be to look at some other MUD implementation and borrow shamelessly.  CircleMUD, say.  They have a very large Windows userbase, so presumably they do good Windows friendly-ish telnet handling.


________________________________
 From: Shentino <shentino at gmail.com>
To: All about DGD and Hydra <dgd at dworkin.nl> 
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2012 7:56 AM
Subject: Re: [DGD] Windows telnet clients
 
I'm using a binary port that shamelessly borrowed some of phantasmal's
telnet handling.

Would that have any effect on things?

On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 7:26 AM, Noah Gibbs <noah_gibbs at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Yeah, Putty is what I always used.  Make sure you're not, like, relying on line mode or anything similarly nonstandard.  Linux telnet is more accomodating than the standard specifically states.  Which is hilarious, given that the standard is kind of a back-port from the implementation.
>
> Every part of calling "telnet" a standard is hilarious, really.
>
>
> ________________________________
>  From: Petter Nyström <jimorie at gmail.com>
> To: All about DGD and Hydra <dgd at dworkin.nl>
> Sent: Monday, May 28, 2012 12:22 AM
> Subject: Re: [DGD] Windows telnet clients
>
> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 6:29 AM, Shentino <shentino at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2.  Is there a good one for windows?
>
> You already ruled out PuTTY. But I never had any problems connecting
> with PuTTY to my DGD MUD. Hmm.
>
> Regards,
> Jimorie
> ___________________________________________
> https://mail.dworkin.nl/mailman/listinfo/dgd
> ___________________________________________
> https://mail.dworkin.nl/mailman/listinfo/dgd
___________________________________________
https://mail.dworkin.nl/mailman/listinfo/dgd