[DGD] Full double precision floats?
Raymond Jennings
shentino at gmail.com
Sat Apr 27 03:00:35 CEST 2013
Would such a feature be acceptable for mainline inclusion or would it need
to be maintained as a separate branch?
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Felix A. Croes <felix at dworkin.nl> wrote:
> Raymond Jennings <shentino at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hey, just curious if there's any cost/benefit factors not immediately
> > obvious if DGD were to expand its floats from 36 bits to the full 64
> bits.
>
> I guess you mean 36 bits to 52 bits. You'll get 16 more bits of mantissa,
> not 28 bits.
>
> The main drawback would be storage. It would take more space, both in
> memory and in snapshots. And of course, snapshots would have to be
> converted.
>
> Regards,
> Felix Croes
> ____________________________________________
> https://mail.dworkin.nl/mailman/listinfo/dgd
>
More information about the DGD
mailing list