[DGD] sha-256

[Raymond Jennings]

parse_string makes callbacks to LPC though.

Would that be a special case or would the extension interface itself have
adapted to that had it been around back then?

On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 8:26 AM, <bart at wotf.org> wrote:

> On Sun, 31 Jan 2016 16:53:03 +0100, Felix A. Croes wrote
>
> > There is a lot in vanilla DGD that I would have implemented as
> > extensions, had there been extensions at the time.  For example,
> > parse_string() and the ASN functions.  And of course SHA1, MD5,
> >  hash_crc16 and hash_crc32.
>
> Hmm, so about everything in kfun/extra.c and then a bit? Kinda makes sense.
>
> Bart
> --
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mrobjective/
> http://www.om-d.org/
>
> ____________________________________________
> https://mail.dworkin.nl/mailman/listinfo/dgd
>