[DGD] Is Running Atomically.

[bart at wotf.org]

On Sun, 25 Sep 2016 00:45:33 +0100, Gary wrote

<snip>

> Since that's based on ticks remaining however, there were times when 
> it evaluated to 0. I think that's when rlimits was disabled during 
> compilation, so this method was not reliable enough.

You could wrap it in its own rlimits with a finite number of ticks, that
should resolve that. 

Bart.
--
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mrobjective/
http://www.om-d.org/