[DGD] Error handling, possible bug

[Felix A. Croes]

Raymond Jennings <shentino at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hey um...is it normal for atomic_error to be bypassed if an error
> within atomic context is caught?

It is normal if the catch is done within the same atomic error context,
since in that case there is no rollback.


> I was playing around with the "return a string from an error handler"
> feature and noticed that atomic_error got skipped if the error in
> question happens to be caught.
>
> Also, is there supposed to be any functional difference between
> catch(expression) and catch{statements}:{morestatement} in terms of
> calls to driver->foobar_error(...)?

There is no difference there.

Regards,
Felix Croes