[DGD] Scope call syntax

[Blain]

I think scoping variables would be cool.

string foo;
void myfunc(string foo) {
  ::foo = foo;
}

*ducks*

On Feb 13, 2017 5:03 PM, "Raymond Jennings" <shentino at gmail.com> wrote:

> I think "goto" became a reserved word or something at some point...but yes,
> unless you're developing for the linux kernel or otherwise know what you're
> doing (ducks a tomato), you should avoid goto like the plague IMO.
>
> Is it used in Hydra?
>
> *looks at dworkin*
>
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 2:42 PM, <bart at wotf.org> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 15:13:30 -0600, Blain wrote
> > > I realized after I hit send that I'm segfaulting because I'm within
> > > unlimited stack rlimits. :)  I guess I should load user-made subdomains
> > > after a callout from initd's create().
> >
> > That seems like a good idea. In general, running with unlimited stack or
> > ticks
> > is a bad idea (tm), and will indeed cause a segfault on infinite
> recursion.
> > Limiting the stack size will prevent that.
> >
> > Its there for if you know what you are doing, but you are on your own
> when
> > running with unlimited ticks or stack.
> >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 3:10 PM, Blain <blain20 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I have this bad habit of letting up on the SHIFT key while typing
> "::"
> > and
> > > > doing "mylib:;func()".  A few times, it's actually caused (or seemed
> to
> > > > cause) a segfault.
> >
> > According to comp/parser.y its an identifier to be used with goto
> > statements.
> > Funny, thats also what I expected it to be from the behavior and syntax,
> > but
> > had to look at the source to confirm because
> >
> > goto??
> >
> > iirc there is no goto statement ;-)
> >
> > Bart.
> > --
> > http://www.flickr.com/photos/mrobjective/
> > http://www.om-d.org/
> >
> > ____________________________________________
> > https://mail.dworkin.nl/mailman/listinfo/dgd
> ____________________________________________
> https://mail.dworkin.nl/mailman/listinfo/dgd