[DGD] lambda operator re-re-visited?

[Felix A. Croes]

Dread Quixadhal <quixadhal at gmail.com> wrote:

> If closures use a unique syntax, which they do in other LPC drivers, you
> know, at the point of compilation of the object they are defined in, that
> they are closures.
>
> Is it impossible to mark them as such and put the expression source in the
> object data?  For that matter, I don't see why the full source of all
> objects can't be stored inside their object data.

In the posting that you first responded to, I pointed out a problem
with recompiling closures for which the source code can be retrieved.
How do you propose to solve this problem?

Regards,
Felix Croes