[DGD] lambda operator re-re-visited?

[Felix A. Croes]

Dread Quixadhal <quixadhal at gmail.com> wrote:

>[...]
> It is possible to have anonymous functions that would be useful, if the
> user were careful and understood the implications of using them in a
> persistent system. But if you require a 100% bulletproof solution for every
> conceivable use case, then I'll stop commenting here, because I don't think
> it's possible.  Like the old strtok() function from the C standard library,
> it can be very handy, and it can hurt you badly if you don't know what it
> does.

Well, it makes sense that you prefer fluffos.

Regards,
Felix Croes