[DGD] DGD 1.5.5

[bart at wotf.org]

A small patch to make the network extensions compile again after this change.

---

diff --git a/src/comm.cpp b/src/comm.cpp
index fa78c3a..6bdd36a 100644
--- a/src/comm.cpp
+++ b/src/comm.cpp
@@ -502,6 +502,7 @@ static void comm_del(Frame *f, user *usr, Object *obj,
bool destruct)
     }
 }
 
+#ifndef NETWORK_EXTENSIONS
 /*
  * NAME:       comm->challenge()
  * DESCRIPTION:        set the UDP challenge for a binary connection
@@ -534,6 +535,7 @@ void comm_challenge(Object *obj, String *str)
     PUT_STRVAL_NOREF(&val, str);
     d_assign_elt(data, arr, v, &val);
 }
+#endif
 
 /*
  * NAME:       comm->write()
@@ -1042,6 +1044,7 @@ static void comm_baccept(Frame *f, connection *conn, int
port)
     this_user = OBJ_NONE;
 }
 
+#ifndef NETWORK_EXTENSIONS
 /*
  * NAME:       comm->daccept()
  * DESCRIPTION:        accept a datagram connection
@@ -1074,6 +1077,7 @@ static void comm_daccept(Frame *f, connection *conn, int
port)
     endtask();
     this_user = OBJ_NONE;
 }
+#endif
 
 /*
  * NAME:       comm->receive()


On Wed, 15 Mar 2017 09:47:49 +0100, Felix A. Croes wrote
> bart at wotf.org wrote:
> 
> > With dgd supporting outbound tcp connections and this addition of udp,
> > 'vanilla' dgd supports most things the network extensions seem to be used for.
> > I do use the ability to open arbitrary ports, and there are some slight
> > differences in behavior.
> 
> The network extensions don't support UDP very well.  There is no notion
> of UDP connections, so all incoming packets on a UDP port are kept in
> the same buffer by the OS, from which DGD reads one packet once a while
> in between executing LPC code.
> 
> After the introduction of UDP connections, it becomes possible to 
> have a dedicated thread reading incoming UDP packets and storing 
> them in per- connection buffers.  That will make supporting 1000 UDP 
> users feasible, just like 1000 TCP users are now.
> 
> > I suppose this also means being able to send udp datagrams from an udp user
> > object, but is it possible to initiate sending udp from dgd?
> 
> Not yet.  If the network extensions can be reworked to provide only that
> additional functionality, through for instance connect(addr, port, 
> "udp"), then as far as I'm concerned we can do away with the NETWORK_EXTENSIONS
> macro.
> 
> Regards,
> Felix Croes
> ____________________________________________
> https://mail.dworkin.nl/mailman/listinfo/dgd


--
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mrobjective/
http://www.om-d.org/