[DGD] connect_datagram()

[bart at wotf.org]

A fixed/static user to port mapping is still not something you can count on,
if it happens it is rather unusual for tcp at least, regardless of who is
doing nat. 

Bart

On Mon, 17 Dec 2018 21:05:03 -0800, Raymond Jennings wrote
> The NAT I speak of was more the kind done by an ISP.
> 
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 8:58 PM Felix A. Croes <felix at dworkin.nl> wrote:
> >
> > Raymond Jennings <shentino at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Speaking of the networking package, will there be a way for the upper
> > > layers to know what the remote port is for an inbound connection?
> > >
> > > When a remote user is behind NAT this may be useful for tracing.
> >
> > Perhaps as part of a future networking package.
> >
> > Almost every user is behind a router with NAT these days, and most of
> > these routers add variance to the remote port, they don't constrain it.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Felix Croes
> > ____________________________________________
> > https://mail.dworkin.nl/mailman/listinfo/dgd
> ____________________________________________
> https://mail.dworkin.nl/mailman/listinfo/dgd


--
https://www.bartsplace.net/
https://wotf.org/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/mrobjective/