[DGD] Fatal error when no user object returned

[Raymond Jennings]

Nothing personal of course.  This is just one geek to another having a
technical debate.
On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 9:22 PM Blain <blain20 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I think you're way off base and beating a dead horse.  I'm out.
>
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2018, 23:19 Raymond Jennings <shentino at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > My personal opinion on this issue is as follows:
> >
> > * This is dworkin's program and he can write it how he darn pleases
> >
> > * "provide mechanism, not policy"
> >
> > DGD is the kernel from the point of view of LPC.  DGD should confine
> > itself to mechanism as much as possible, and any policy decisions
> > should be left in LPC.  Let LPC decide how the nuts and bolts go
> > together.  DGD saying "wtf?  you were supposed to give me a connection
> > object that would decide what to do.  I can't make up your mind for
> > you so I'm going to crash now, because you shouldn't be making me
> > decide thsi for myself"
> >
> > From what I've seen in the code, DGD will, however, close the
> > connection automatically if there's an LPC side runtime error inside
> > of blah_connect.
> > ____________________________________________
> > https://mail.dworkin.nl/mailman/listinfo/dgd
> ____________________________________________
> https://mail.dworkin.nl/mailman/listinfo/dgd