[MUD-Dev] Re: after the plague: mud report
Ling
K.L.Lo-94 at student.lboro.ac.uk
Mon Aug 10 13:46:37 CEST 1998
On Sat, 8 Aug 1998, quzah wrote:
> From: S. Patrick Gallaty <choke at sirius.com>
>
> >Well, someone here referred me to "After the Plague" at atp.deltav.hu port
> 3000,
[snip stuff about various features]
I do suggest taking a look at DartMUD which is in the FAQ. Although the
game never did reach 'critical mass' and take-off, it is probably still
one of _the_ reference muds. It's also years old and dead buggy but
that's besides the point. :P
If you can't wait for the FAQ: <URL:telnet://dartmud.com:2525>
With respect to After the Plague:
> [snip]
> >The most interesting thing there is their 'party' system, where players
> >(and monsters) can put themselves into 'front' and 'back' ranks so that
> >fighters defend and mages/archers/thieves can throw spells and knives and
> >whatnot from the back rank. I've escorted people who were in danger
> >of being pkilled and bodyguarded them by being in the front rank in their
> >'party.'
A similar system is implemented in DartMUD which uses 'rows'. Characters
within a party may select a row. Only two characters may occupy a row at
a time, the rest you can extrapolate.
> >It's an excellent mechanic, and I am surprised I haven't seen it elsewhere
> >before.
Amazing isn't it? It's such a logical outgrowth to the party concept yet
it took several years to appear.
> A note on that aspect, or rather a question. It sounds rather interesting,
> but I was wondering if they had a 'direction of travel' or rather, 'group
> facing' for the party? The reason I ask, is if there is front and back rank
> it would seem logical for me to hide in the brush, and wait until they walk
> past, then shoot the mage in the back with an arrow, or drop from a tree so
> that I'm behind the mage, thus reversing the facing of the group when they
> turn around, resulting in the mages and archers being in the front, and the
> warriors being in the back.
Not for DartMUD. Such a system is far more work than simply adding
'positions' within a party. I also suspect the 'feel' of the system
would breakdown in the event of a rumble with more than 3 parties.
In any case, how would you define a party? Surely, it's just a group of
kids in a loose knit formation? Instead of joining a party, a character
could opt to follow Bubba and try to stay 5 metres behind and left.....
This is providing you don't use parties as some sort of joint exp
accumulation machine.
[features snipped]
'After the Plague'? Hmm.... When organics die, it doesn't have the
corpses exploding into a puff of spores does it? (a la DartMUD :)
| Ling Lo of Remora (Top Banana)
_O_O_ Elec Eng Dept, Loughborough University, UK. kllo at iee.org
More information about the mud-dev-archive
mailing list