[MUD-Dev] Diku & GPL
Richard.Woolcock at rsuk.rohde-schwarz.com
Richard.Woolcock at rsuk.rohde-schwarz.com
Thu Dec 7 10:22:45 CET 2000
Jon Lambert <tychomud at ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
> A critical point:
>
> While a product can be relicensed, current users of that product
> perforce have the *right* to choose which license (older or newer)
> they care to operate under. If not, the product vendor would be
> in the position of retroactively rewriting the contract between
> themselves and their users without their users having any say in
> the matter.
>
> While I'm sure some vendors would (briefly) love such a situation,
> the potential for abuse is enourmous, which is why contract law
> doesn't work that way.
I was under the impression that the mud administrators were the "users",
not the players. This is the same problem that means a GPL'd Diku
wouldn't have to display the copyright notices to the players, only
to the "user/s" - the people running the mud.
--
KaVir.
_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev mailing list
MUD-Dev at kanga.nu
https://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev
More information about the mud-dev-archive
mailing list