[MUD-Dev] Small scale commercial text MUDs

[Bruce]

John W Pierce wrote:

> The largest problem with running a small scale commercial text MUD,
> as far as I'm concerned, is lack of a decent affordable driver. I'm
> not fond of drivers that interpret user input as executable code, no
> matter how good they say their security is, so that eliminates
> Genesis/ColdC (in my opinion, by far the best of this type),
> LambdaMOO, et al. I like even less systems that are, to all intents

I'm not sure what you mean here with respect to treating user input as
executable code and how Cold or MOO do that, with the exception of the
'eval' command.  Could you elaborate?

  - Bruce

_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev mailing list
MUD-Dev at kanga.nu
https://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev