[MUD-Dev] Star Wars Galaxies: 1 character per server
Travis Nixon
tnixon at avalanchesoftware.com
Thu Dec 19 12:35:18 CET 2002
Marc Fielding wrote:
> But it's not simply a matter of storage. Raph described the
> problem as follows:
> "I'll say it flatly--a character record in SWG is FAR larger
> than you think. There's a business reality to see here. We share
> fancy databases over multiple servers. Said fancy databases cost
> $X up to a certain size. Then they cost ten times that if you go
> over that limit by one byte because you have to buy the 'next
> size up.'"
> Seems like a legitimate problem to me.
At the surface, yes, until you read the "sharing over multiple
servers" part, at which point you're right back to the cost of 2
characters on 1 server being exactly the same as the cost of 2
characters on 2 servers.
Again, there are many reasons that you might want to have single
character servers, and I actually agree with a lot of them. The "if
its not a race, then why are you upset that they're winning" jab was
not meant to indicate that I dispute the various problems that
muling can cause, but to express amusement about the typical "Stupid
powergamer, you're messing up the game for me. It's not a race,
stop winning!" diatribe.
I just prefer calling a rose a rose and a mule a mule. Either the
reasoning is justifiable or not. Don't construct nonsense reasons
because "they sound good" or "people might really be able to get
their head around them", or, what I suspect was actually the case,
"lets make it sound like we didn't have a choice, and that there are
technical reasons that we had to make a decision that we know will
be wildly unpopular".
_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev mailing list
MUD-Dev at kanga.nu
https://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev
More information about the mud-dev-archive
mailing list