[MUD-Dev] DCMA -- another weapon in the fight against Emulators
Frank Crowell
frankc at maddog.com
Fri Mar 1 19:58:19 CET 2002
From: <bruce at cubik.org>
> That's a legal analysis of the situation and eventually ends with:
> "It seems pretty clear that even if bnetd is a circumvention
> device, then it clearly falls under the exemption of
> 1201(f)(2), since any circumvention is only for the purpose of
> achieving interoperability between bnetd and the Blizzard
> game. Such interoperability does not constitute infringement,
> since it does not violate sections 106-118 or 602."
argh bruce. you are going to force me to read that aren't you. It
was a lot easier in the early days when the lawyers would just say
things like "just change 20%" or "...as long as you didn't have
access to the code...".
frank
_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev mailing list
MUD-Dev at kanga.nu
https://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev
More information about the mud-dev-archive
mailing list