[MUD-Dev] No bots allowed
Travis Casey
efindel at earthlink.net
Fri Mar 22 16:05:20 CET 2002
Tuesday, March 12, 2002, 4:35:58 AM, Daniel.Harman at barclayscapital.com wrote:
[getting back to my 'fun' email after a few weeks of having been too busy...]
> I've never understood that either, because none of these games
> have any real tactics in the straight melee combat, nor in the
> spell combat. Its simply a case of damage over time. The reason
> the current online games had the super powerful monsters designed
> for a whole group was due to polygon count as far as I can
> tell. Saying that humans are so superior that monster AI couldn't
> cope, whilst fashionable doesn't really cut much ice when you
> analyse it.
I don't think polygon count is the explanation, though -- you see
the same type of thing happen even in text-based games. Here's two
things I think are contributing factors:
1 - The desire to be a hero. People would rather take on a single
uber-monster than a pack of kobolds, even if the kobold pack is
objectively harder to kill. Why? Because it's mythic. Great
heroes slay great monsters.
2 - Initiative. Not in the paper RPG sense of "who goes first",
but in the sense of "who's in control." In a traditional RPG
scenario, the PCs are the active component -- they go to the
monsters, the monsters don't come to them. In many games,
especially older text-based ones, monsters won't even give chase
when you flee. The upshot is that while the game designer chooses
the place of the fight, the players choose the timing. They can
freely take time to go get the most powerful weapons, the best
armor, and the best healing and magic they can. The monsters, in
contrast, generally have to handle the players with whatever the
designer gave them.
--
Travis Casey
efindel at earthlink.net
_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev mailing list
MUD-Dev at kanga.nu
https://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev
More information about the mud-dev-archive
mailing list