[DGD]1.1.52

[Felix A. Croes]

Mikael Lind <z94lind at mtek.chalmers.se> wrote:

>[...]
> On another (but related) subject: will DGD ever support a boolean type? I
> would like that very, very much. 

You're not the only one who has asked for this, but a boolean type
doesn't mix very well with LPC's C-derived operators.  As you may
know, LPC before DGD has a `status' type which I chose to eliminate
rather than make into an actual boolean type.

What exactly do you see as the advantages of a bollean type?

Regards,
Dworkin

List config page:  http://list.imaginary.com/mailman/listinfo/dgd