[DGD] Mudlibs

[George Reese]

As someone who once did that for MudOS, I would strongly advise against it.
Out of the box mudlibs destroy creativity and do little help advance mudding
except increase the number of muds without seriously increasing the number
of mudders. The result is the same talent spread across tons of clone muds.

-----Original Message-----
From: dgd-admin at list.imaginary.com
[mailto:dgd-admin at list.imaginary.com]On Behalf Of James J. Bennett
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 10:34
To: dgd at list.imaginary.com
Subject: Re: [DGD] Mudlibs


I have heard some talk in the past that "someone" should put together a
"mud in a box" lib for dgd.  I'd have to say that I agree, however I am not
that someone and I am guessing that most just don't have the time to spend
on a full lib to hand out free.

I'd love to be a part of such an effort if anyone is interested in working
on such a project.

JB

At 02:23 AM 8/14/01, you wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I've had a good look around from mudlibs for DGD and really
>have not found many available, aside from the base kernel
>mudlib, and lpmud that ship with dgd.
>
>The only one I've found so far is Melville. Are there any other
>mudlibs out there for dgd that are available? I've heard about
>Lima but not yet found it, is this a dgd mudlib or is that for
>another driver?
>
>bb.
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>List config page:  http://list.imaginary.com/mailman/listinfo/dgd


_________________________________________________________________
List config page:  http://list.imaginary.com/mailman/listinfo/dgd

_________________________________________________________________
List config page:  http://list.imaginary.com/mailman/listinfo/dgd