[DGD] Persistance
Shevek
shevek at btinternet.com
Fri Dec 28 20:11:23 CET 2001
At 12:16 28/12/01 -0500, you wrote:
>On Fri, 28 Dec 2001, Kevin N. Carpenter wrote:
> > > It's exciting to think what persistence could bring to a MUD. Players
> > > could be allowed to change the landscape - but wisdom tells us that
> > > players aren't always going to be thematically correct, and sometimes
> > > they are going to be sloppy, poorly described, with typos and
> > > grammatical errors.
Letting players build directly is always going to lead to complications
like this. I'm thinking they should be allowed to build indirectly though,
as one means of helping maintain the interest of any long term players you
might have.
Does anyone think it might be possible to have a blueprint type thing? What
I mean is an object the player can use to design a set of rooms for
themselves as a series of string outputs/command inputs etc without any
objects ever being created within the game environment itself. Then once
the player is happy with the look/feel of their blueprint they could hand
it over to one of the wizards/admins for approval. Then if approved throw
it over to a wizard for coding.
It would be a fairly complicated object to go about coding, but it could be
extremely useful not only for vetting player designs but also to help
introduce a different tier of wizard, the non-coding builder. Any design
made with the blueprint object is liable to need only standard objects so a
couple of coders could keep up with a larger number of builder's rooms.
Only problem there is that using standard objects the non-coding builders'
areas would get fairly similar unless you also give them the opportunity to
throw in some non-standard objects, which means assigning a couple more
coders to producing objects on demand. That being said, is it better to
have 3-4 folks who actually know how to produce tight, safe code on demand
for people who don't, or let everyone produce code even though what most
actually want to do is imagineer. I'd say the former would give you a
better model, but that's just personal opinion.
Cheers,
Shevek
_________________________________________________________________
List config page: http://list.imaginary.com/mailman/listinfo/dgd
More information about the DGD
mailing list