[DGD] Net package

[Noah Lee Gibbs]

On Sat, 5 Apr 2003, Erwin Harte wrote:
> > 3. Should I implement telnet connections or just raw TCP or UDP? It
> >    seems redundant to implement telnet in the driver when a little
> >    LPC in the kernel mudlib would produce the same effect I believe?
> 
> If you stick to raw TCP and UDP and provide an LPC emulation of what
> Dworkin has written in C in the vanilla DGD, that would probably make
> your life and that of others a lot easier and happier as it allows you
> to not worry about the difference on the C side and others can extend
> the LPC code if they so wish.

  Just so that I've mentioned -- if you do this, and put the LPC chunk to 
emulate telnet into the public domain, there is a *lot* I could do with 
this :-)  So be advised that if you do it this way and the license works, 
Phantasmal will absolutely use/steal (with credit to you of course) your 
implementation of an LPC telnet port.
  Or you could use some other license (or specifically ask me not to) and 
I wouldn't :-)

-- 
angelbob at monkeyspeak.com
See my page of DGD documentation at
"http://phantasmal.sourceforge.net/DGD/"
If you post to the DGD list, you may see yourself there!

_________________________________________________________________
List config page:  http://list.imaginary.com/mailman/listinfo/dgd