[DGD] Java or LPC (DGD)?
Felix A. Croes
felix at dworkin.nl
Sun Aug 10 13:33:00 CEST 2003
"Ben Chambers" <bjchamb at bellsouth.net> wrote:
> Java
>
>[...]
>
> + Better syntax for objects (in my opinion, the C++/Java object system is
> much cleaner than the one used in LPC)
What in particular do you consider to be better about the syntax?
> - Possibly slower?
LPC used to be faster, but these days it's probably the other way around.
> LPC
>
> + Designed explicitly for a MUD Server
>
> + Gives persistence for free
DGD has persistence to a degree that is not possible with Java.
>[...]
> Are there any points for either of the two that I missed? Which of the
> points that I put in there aren't really significant? Which language would
> you recommend?
- Java is multi-threaded
- LPC has multiple inheritance
- Java has interfaces, LPC has include files
- Java has much stronger typing (a bit too strong for a persistent
system, perhaps)
- Java has more basic datatypes (for example, different integer types)
- Java's error handling is more fine-grained; DGD has atomic error
handling
And I would use DGD, of course. :)
Regards,
Dworkin
_________________________________________________________________
List config page: http://list.imaginary.com/mailman/listinfo/dgd
More information about the DGD
mailing list