[DGD] Re: My idea for the DGD driver - validate

[Robert Forshaw]

>From: Stephen Schmidt <schmidsj at union.edu>
> > I thought it would be obvious from my
> > posts that I'm not so inept as to not know what they are.
>
>I cannot help but say that that conclusion was not obvious to me
>at all.

I'm sorry your reading comprehension isn't good enough. Nice insult by the 
way.

>
> > As to the 'static'
> > being ommited, yes I didn't mention static. I thought I had. Not that it
> > matters, since none of it was really applicable to my post.
>
>The fact that static is in fact quite applicable to your post
>could only confirm the non-obviousness of the earlier conclusion.

I don't care about it. Please stay on topic.

_________________________________________________________________
Stay in touch with absent friends - get MSN Messenger 
http://www.msn.co.uk/messenger

_________________________________________________________________
List config page:  http://list.imaginary.com/mailman/listinfo/dgd