[DGD] Another mudlib requirement

[Steve Foley]

From: "Felix A. Croes" <felix at dworkin.nl>

> In theory, the granularity could be brought down to individual array
> elements...

> In DGD/MP, the granularity is just below objects...

> Doing this for individual array elements would be possible, but then
> there would also be the administrative overhead of keeping track, for
> each array element, of which thread last modified it.

So, if these array elements were LWOs, and the changes were made to data in the
LWO but not the array itself you could avoid a reschedule?  I'm assuming when
you say 'objects' that includes LWOs, but I just wanted to be sure.

Your responses in this thread have been very helpful.  Thanks again.

_________________________________________________________________
List config page:  http://list.imaginary.com/mailman/listinfo/dgd