[DGD] Another mudlib requirement

[Felix A. Croes]

"Steve Foley" <zeppo1 at mindspring.com> wrote:

> > Doing this for individual array elements would be possible, but then
> > there would also be the administrative overhead of keeping track, for
> > each array element, of which thread last modified it.
>
> So, if these array elements were LWOs, and the changes were made to data in the
> LWO but not the array itself you could avoid a reschedule?  I'm assuming when
> you say 'objects' that includes LWOs, but I just wanted to be sure.

Sorry, no, I mean persistent objects only.  DGD manages light-weight
objects internally as arrays, most of the time.

Regards,
Dworkin
_________________________________________________________________
List config page:  http://list.imaginary.com/mailman/listinfo/dgd