[DGD] Re: status

[Noah Gibbs]

--- "Felix A. Croes" <felix at dworkin.nl> wrote:
> This is not true for clones, only for light-weight
> objects.  When you
> destruct the master object of a clone, the clone
> persists.

  Okay.  Then I think I no longer understand why you
can't have an object be both inheritable and
cloneable.  If an object has clones and you destruct
it and rebuild, the clones won't get updated (I
assume)...  But they won't lose data.

  So is the whole thing just to keep the clones from
being un-updatable?


=====
------
noah_gibbs at yahoo.com

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes
http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus
_________________________________________________________________
List config page:  http://list.imaginary.com/mailman/listinfo/dgd