[DGD] Re: status

[Robert Forshaw]

>From: Noah Gibbs <noah_gibbs at yahoo.com>
>   Well, the way to solve it would be if DGD let you
>directly recompile an object that had child classes
>(which it doesn't).  Instead you have to destruct and
>recompile, which destroys all your clones (if any).

This is something I wasn't aware of. When you say 'destroy' do you mean 
'destruct and linger in memory' or completely remove? I was going to 
hand-code a feature in the destruct_object() masking function to seek out 
(with an object manager?) all the objects children and destruct them, so I 
didn't have stray clones lying around; does this mean I don't have to do 
that?

_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself with cool new emoticons http://www.msn.co.uk/specials/myemo

_________________________________________________________________
List config page:  http://list.imaginary.com/mailman/listinfo/dgd