[DGD] Recursion in recompile(), is this correct?

Robert Forshaw iouswuoibev at hotmail.com
Sat Jan 10 22:31:00 CET 2004


>From: Bart van Leeuwen <bart at wotf.org>
> > According to the comment (which is from /doc/Introduction in the
> > distribution) this is not the case:
> > ("If B should actually be recompiled (inheriting the new version of C 
>from
> > B), the driver object must destruct B"). Did I misinterpret that?
>
>Correct, you get an error if you try to just compile such an object so you
>have to dest it to get the new code compiled.

Correct that I misinterpreted it or correct in what I was thinking?

_________________________________________________________________
Tired of 56k? Get a FREE BT Broadband connection 
http://www.msn.co.uk/specials/btbroadband

_________________________________________________________________
List config page:  http://list.imaginary.com/mailman/listinfo/dgd



More information about the DGD mailing list