[DGD] Recursion in recompile(), is this correct?
Robert Forshaw
iouswuoibev at hotmail.com
Sat Jan 10 22:31:00 CET 2004
>From: Bart van Leeuwen <bart at wotf.org>
> > According to the comment (which is from /doc/Introduction in the
> > distribution) this is not the case:
> > ("If B should actually be recompiled (inheriting the new version of C
>from
> > B), the driver object must destruct B"). Did I misinterpret that?
>
>Correct, you get an error if you try to just compile such an object so you
>have to dest it to get the new code compiled.
Correct that I misinterpreted it or correct in what I was thinking?
_________________________________________________________________
Tired of 56k? Get a FREE BT Broadband connection
http://www.msn.co.uk/specials/btbroadband
_________________________________________________________________
List config page: http://list.imaginary.com/mailman/listinfo/dgd
More information about the DGD
mailing list