[DGD] priority of call_other macro

[Kirk Smith]

While the first is present quite often in old code, strictly
technically speaking, I believe the driver's reaction is quite
correct. Personally, I prefer being forced to write good code. If this
is changed, perhaps it should only function as indicated at lower
typechecking levels?

> When doing something like the following:
>
> if(!obj -> query_exists(etc))
>
> this evaluates to:
>
> if(nil -> query_exists(etc))
>
> So it becomes necessary to put the following instead:
>
> if(!(obj -> query_exists(etc)))
>
> Can this be made so that the first example is valid?
>

----------------------------------
Kirk Smith
http://www.onlybackwards.com/
----------------------------------
_________________________________________________________________
List config page:  http://list.imaginary.com/mailman/listinfo/dgd