[DGD] priority of call_other macro

[Matt Tolton]

> While the first is present quite often in old code, strictly
>technically speaking, I believe the driver's reaction is quite
>correct. Personally, I prefer being forced to write good code. If this
>is changed, perhaps it should only function as indicated at lower
>typechecking levels?

I disagree with that since obj->query_exists(etc) is supposed to be
equivalent to call_other(obj,"query_exists",etc).  It seems like the ->
operator should have a higher priority in the order of operations than
the ! operator.

-Matt
_________________________________________________________________
List config page:  http://list.imaginary.com/mailman/listinfo/dgd