[DGD] Would the Net package kill binary connections?

[Greg Lewis]

On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 11:35:16PM -0400, John Ruiz wrote:
> I'm running dgd-1.2p4 + net/ansi/comment on SuSE 9.1.  I'm building on 
> top of the net-patched kernel lib.
> 
> In my .dgd config file, I specify the telnet port as 6047 and the binary 
> port as 6048.  When I run the mud, 'netstat -na' shows a listening 
> server on 6047 (tcp), but nowhere can I find anything listening on 6048.
> 
> So, I downloaded and installed vanilla DGD.  Upon starting it up, there 
> is indeed both 6047 and 6048.  Neither ANSI nor Comment patches are 
> going to kill connection stuff, so it has to be the network patch.
> 
> Does anyone have any idea what the network patch is doing to kill binary 
> connections?  And if so, what can I do about it?

AFAIK, there is no binary port with the networking patches.  Instead, only
the primary telnet port is opened by default and all other ports must
be opened with the open_port() kfun that the networking patches add.

-- 
Greg Lewis                          Email   : glewis at eyesbeyond.com
Eyes Beyond                         Web     : http://www.eyesbeyond.com
Information Technology              FreeBSD : glewis at FreeBSD.org
_________________________________________________________________
List config page:  http://list.imaginary.com/mailman/listinfo/dgd