Erwin Harte wrote: >> Thanks for the clarification. Does the concept "psuedo-language" refer >> to anything specific? > > Just 'not a real language'. If you parse, compile and execute it, that > makes it quite real, doesn't it? I don't know about 'psuedo-language' specifically but 'pseudocode' is pretty well understood :) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudocode