[DGD] Object Manager missing some objects

Shentino shentino at gmail.com
Mon Feb 6 22:31:01 CET 2006


Since only the kernel is allowed to create or delete clones of kernel
objects anyway, I really didn't see any need to bother with them. 
Kernelese clones are for me hands off and I dunnever mess with'em.

Any reason why objectd would need to behave otherwise?

On 2/6/06, Neil McBride <sarak at castinian.org> wrote:
> > Wouldn't just iterating through the source files in /kernel be enough
> > to keep track of all pre-objectd compilations?
>
> You could, but you wouldn't find clones that were created before the
> object manager was initialised using such an approach - whether that's a
> problem is up to you :)  You'd also miss anything that managed to be
> compiled from a string, not that that's a problem with the kernel lib at
> startup.
>
> Neil.
>
> PS. Sorry if this arrives twice - I think I sent the first one using the
> wrong From address :D
>
>
> __________________________________________
> http://mail.dworkin.nl/mailman/listinfo/dgd
>




More information about the DGD mailing list