[DGD] (no subject)

[Noah Gibbs]

  This would be a pretty significant source of overhead if you created a
separate type/class for each of your objects, but then it would be swamped by
the massive compilation overhead.  Under normal use, it's not a significant
source of overhead.

--- Rev Dr Ari D Jordon <x262sm102 at sneakemail.com> wrote:

> --Back in the dark ages (or at least on 7/5/2007 11:09 AM -0700), "Noah 
> Gibbs noah_gibbs-at-yahoo.com |dgd|" <...> had the 
> audacity to proclaim:
> 
> >   If you build your own MUDlib, it's possible to automatically inherit
> > some/all objects from a given parent object, and then add functions to
> > that parent object.  Phantasmal uses this trick for script objects.
> 
> That's the way I currently am doing it.  My main concern is overhead; how 
> significant is the impact of inheriting an object for this purpose a 
> thousand times going to be?
> 
> ---
> God was my copilot, but we crashed in the mountains and I had to eat him.
> ___________________________________________
> https://mail.dworkin.nl/mailman/listinfo/dgd
> 





       
____________________________________________________________________________________
Get the Yahoo! toolbar and be alerted to new email wherever you're surfing.
http://new.toolbar.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/index.php