[DGD] ownership

[Noah Gibbs]

  In general, the same owner needs to create and destroy a given object.  The
exception is System, which can destroy somebody else's object (if I remember
right).

  But for bookkeeping purposes, your best bet is to make sure that the same
object that creates an object destroys it.  It's clean, it's simple, it works. 
If that's not easily possible, I think any object under the same /usr/blah
directory (that is, the same 'blah' :-) will work.

--- "chris ." <psych_mayo at hotmail.com> wrote:

> 
> Just a little confused on some aspects of the kernel libraries ownership and
> security scheme.
> To cut to the chase, I want to destruct a cloned kernel object from a daemon
> in usr/System/.
> I am trying to do this without altering the kernel library.  I already have a
> solution that does, 
> but i would like to leave the kernel library untouched.  Trying to destruct
> from my daemon
> gives me an ownership error.  Calling a function in the object that would
> result in it being 
> destructed does nothing (i am trying to destruct the  connection object from
> inside telnetd, 
> in the query_banner function.  Destructs connections of sitebanned ips).
> There must be an approach to handle this sort of thing, and i am not in the
> know.
> Help and insight would be appreciated.  Thanks
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Climb to the top of the charts!  Play Star Shuffle:  the word scramble
> challenge with star power.
>
http://club.live.com/star_shuffle.aspx?icid=starshuffle_wlmailtextlink_oct___________________________________________
> https://mail.dworkin.nl/mailman/listinfo/dgd
> 




__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com